|
June 2005
First comprehensive
report on English Steiner schools
A unique study, the
first comprehensive mapping of Steiner School Education in England,
conducted by researchers at the University of the West of England
on behalf of the DfES, will be published on 30 June 2005.
This wide-ranging study covers leadership,
curriculum, teaching style and methods, educational philosophy,
the approach to special educational needs and national tests as
well as links with parents and staffing.
Education in Steiner schools is based on
the philosophy of Rudolf Steiner, known as anthroposophy, and the
schools provide an alternative approach to mainstream education
in the UK and many other countries. The schools have distinctive
practices which emphasise the development of the whole child and
in particular the spiritual aspects of their development.
In England there are 23 Steiner schools
and the research covered 21 of these - 15 were visited and a number
of case studies carried out, as well as a survey of Steiner teachers
and a review of existing research studies. The study aimed to identify
good practice, find differences and common ground with mainstream
education, and to find out how the two sectors might learn from
each other.
Current education policy is to broaden choice
for parents through diversity of provision as well as promoting
the freedom for schools to excel through innovation, collaboration
and sharing. The report also makes recommendations should Steiner
schools enter the maintained sector.
Professor Philip Woods who led the research
says the report identified a number of strengths in Steiner schools,
“There was a striking consistency between the schools, despite
a large variation in the size and resources available. Overall we
found areas of good practice such as the early introduction and
approach to modern foreign languages, development of speaking and
listening through oral work and the combination of class and subject
teaching for younger children. In addition the development of good
pace in lessons through an emphasis on rhythm, the emphasis on child
development in guiding the curriculum, and Steiner schools’
approach to art and creativity were all distinctive strengths. We
also found that the emphasis given to teachers reflective activity
and heightened awareness as well as the non-hierarchical, collegial
form of running schools, offers a contrast to current practice in
the maintained sector and may prove relevant for mainstream schools.”
While the report cautions about the difficulties
of transferring practices from schools with differing philosophies,
it says there is considerable scope for many aspects of the good
practice of Steiner schools to inform what goes on in state schools,
and vice versa, and it suggests LEAs, government and Steiner schools
should promote opportunities for professional dialogue between the
two sectors.
Professor Woods says, “We see a great
potential benefit from mutual dialogue and professional interaction
between Steiner and mainstream educators. As well as the good practices
we have identified from Steiner schools there are also areas in
which Steiner schools could benefit from maintained sector practices
such as management skills, organisational and administrative efficiency,
classroom management, working with older secondary school children
and record keeping and assessment.”
The report also identifies the challenges
facing Steiner schools, if they were to become part of the state-funded
sector and offers a series of recommendations to meet these challenges,
“Governments, LEAs and Steiner Schools need to promote a wider
understanding of the philosophy behind the schools, and there needs
to be a greater understanding amongst assessment bodies of the ways
in which Steiner schools assess progress and facilitate pupils’
learning. We also recommend that, if Steiner schools became part
of the state sector, the Government would need to enable Steiner
schools to opt out of the National Curriculum. There would also
be challenges to be met in the way the schools are managed and the
training of teachers.”
The report recommends further research into
the relative effectiveness of Steiner and mainstream school practices
to strengthen the evidence base of Steiner schools.
|